{"product_id":"ethics-at-war","title":"Ethics At War","description":"\u003cp\u003eThis book debates competing approaches to ethical decision-making for members of the armed forces of liberal democratic states.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn this volume, four prominent thinkers propose and debate competing approaches to ethical decision-making for military personnel. Deane-Peter Baker presents and expounds the Ethical Triangulation model, an ethical decision-making method he has employed through much of his career as an applied military ethicist. Rufus Black advocates for a natural law-based approach, one which has heavily influenced the framework formally adopted by the Australian Defence Force. Roger Herbert outlines the Moral Deliberation Roadmap, the moral reasoning framework recently adopted by the US Naval Academy. Iain King then sets out a model of quasi-utilitarian decision-making developed in several post-conflict settings and refined at the UKs Royal College of Defence Studies. After the opening chapters in which each author outlines their favoured decision-making approach, the four contributors then evaluate each others proposals, often critically. Philosopher David Whetham offers some concluding thoughts in which he summarizes areas of agreement between the authors, identifies key areas of difference, and suggests directions for future research.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThis book will be of great interest to students of military ethics, the ethics of war, moral philosophy, and International Relations, as well as military professionals.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"MediaPlace","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":57305598034302,"sku":"NW9781032321202","price":39.97,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0817\/1379\/1261\/files\/9781032321202.jpg?v=1778517616","url":"https:\/\/mediaplace.com\/products\/ethics-at-war","provider":"MediaPlace","version":"1.0","type":"link"}